翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Paradox of a charge in a gravitational field
・ Paradox of analysis
・ Paradox of competition
・ Paradox of enrichment
・ Paradox of fiction
・ Paradox of flexibility
・ Paradox of hedonism
・ Paradox of nihilism
・ Paradox of prosperity
・ Paradox of the Actor
・ Paradox of the Court
・ Paradox of the pesticides
・ Paradox of the plankton
・ Paradox of thrift
・ Paradox of toil
Paradox of tolerance
・ Paradox of value
・ Paradox of voting
・ Paradox Press
・ Paradox psychology
・ Paradox Trail
・ Paradox Valley
・ Paradox vole
・ Paradox, Colorado
・ Paradoxa
・ Paradoxa (fungus)
・ Paradoxa Paradoxa
・ Paradoxa Stoicorum
・ Paradoxa thomensis
・ Paradoxecia


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Paradox of tolerance : ウィキペディア英語版
Paradox of tolerance
The paradox of tolerance arises when a tolerant person holds antagonistic views towards ''intolerance'', and hence is intolerant of it. The tolerant individual would then be by definition intolerant of intolerance.
==Discussions==

Philosopher Karl Popper defined the paradox in 1945 in ''The Open Society and Its Enemies'' Vol. 1.〔Popper, Karl, ''The Open Society and Its Enemies, volume 1, The Spell of Plato,'' 1945 (Routledge, United Kingdom); ISBN 0-415-29063-5
978-0-691-15813-6 (1 volume 2013 Princeton ed.)〕
"Less well known is the ''paradox of tolerance'': Unlimited tolerance must lead to the disappearance of tolerance. If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them."

He concluded that we are warranted in refusing to tolerate intolerance: "We should therefore claim, in the name of tolerance, the right not to tolerate the intolerant."
In 1971, philosopher John Rawls concludes in ''A Theory of Justice'' that a just society must tolerate the intolerant, for otherwise, the society would then itself be intolerant, and thus unjust. However, Rawls also insists, like Popper, that society has a reasonable right of self-preservation that supersedes the principle of tolerance: "While an intolerant sect does not itself have title to complain of intolerance, its freedom should be restricted only when the tolerant sincerely and with reason believe that their own security and that of the institutions of liberty are in danger."
In a 1997 work, Michael Walzer asked "Should we tolerate the intolerant?" He notes that most minority religious groups who are the beneficiaries of tolerance are themselves intolerant, at least in some respects. In a tolerant regime, such people may learn to tolerate, or at least to behave "as if they possessed this virtue".〔Walzer, Michael, ''On Toleration'', (New Haven: Yale University Press 1997) pp. 80-81 ISBN 0-300-07600-2〕

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Paradox of tolerance」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.